Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Fee as Unauthorized Tax

What Happened?

In a significant immigration law development, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled on Monday that the $100,000 H-1B visa fee imposed by the Trump administration is unconstitutional — vacating it in its entirety.

U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin of the District of Massachusetts found that the fee, which had been applied to new H-1B petitions, constitutes a tax that Congress never authorized the President to impose. In his ruling, Judge Sorokin stated that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not grant the executive branch the power to levy a tax of this nature without explicit Congressional delegation.


Why Does This Matter?

The $100,000 fee had placed an enormous financial burden on U.S. employers who sponsor foreign national workers through the H-1B visa program — particularly companies in the technology, healthcare, engineering, and research sectors that rely heavily on the program to fill specialized roles.

By striking down the fee, the court has provided significant relief to employers and petitioners who were facing this unprecedented financial barrier. This ruling reaffirms a foundational constitutional principle: the power to tax belongs to Congress, not the President.


The Legal Background

The case, State of California et al. v. Noem et al. (Case No. 1:25-cv-13829), was brought by a coalition of states challenging the legality of the fee. Judge Sorokin rejected the government’s argument that the President’s broad authority to restrict the entry of noncitizens provided sufficient legal backing for the payment.

The court was clear: broad immigration powers do not translate into the power to impose taxes. That authority requires an explicit delegation from Congress — and no such delegation exists in the INA.


What Happens Next?

While this ruling is a major victory for employers and H-1B petitioners, it is important to note that the government is widely expected to appeal the decision. Until any appeals are resolved, the legal landscape could continue to shift.

At Ayoub & Associates, P.C., we are closely monitoring this case and any further developments. Our team is committed to keeping our clients informed and prepared as this situation evolves.


What Should You Do?

If you are an employer currently sponsoring H-1B workers, or a foreign national with a pending or upcoming H-1B petition, we strongly encourage you to consult with an experienced immigration attorney to understand how this ruling may affect your specific situation.


This blog post is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your situation, please contact our office directly.