Credit: Internal emails obtained by The Guardian (June 4, 2025)
Overview
Recent revelations show that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has implemented aggressive tactics to ramp up arrests—even detaining individuals not originally targeted, called “collateral arrests.” These measures aim to push the daily arrest count toward the administration’s unofficial quota, reportedly 3,000 per day.Credit: Internal emails obtained by The Guardian (June 4, 2025)
The Emails
Two senior ICE officials, Marcos Charles and Francisco Madrigal, issued weekend directives urging officers to “turn the creative knob up to 11” and pursue any opportunity to place handcuffs on wrists—even for bystanders with no criminal record. Charles’s memo explicitly encouraged arresting anyone “amenable to removal.” Madrigal underscored the urgency by pushing weekend arrest increases compared to previous weeks.
What Are Collateral Arrests?
These occur when ICE agents, armed with a warrant for a specific individual, sweep up others—family members, roommates, co-workers—found in the vicinity, regardless of criminal history. The practice can bypass traditional warrant or probable cause requirements.
Legal & Ethical Red Flags
-
Due process concerns: Civil rights attorneys argue that targeting non-criminal individuals without probable cause risks violating Fourth Amendment protections.
-
Settlement issues: A 2022 court agreement required warrants or documented probable cause for arrests; critics say recent tactics infringe on those limits.
-
Discrimination risks: Experts warn the approach opens the door to racial profiling and haphazard targeting of vulnerable communities.
Impact on Immigrant Communities
Since the directives, ICE has detained over 2,200 individuals—many without criminal records—during routine check-ins or court appearances. Among the detained was a fourth-grade student separated during a court proceeding, a case sparking concern over overcrowded facilities and wrongful arrests.
Broader Strategy & Pushback
-
These tactics align with the Trump administration’s fulfillment of a campaign promise for “mass deportation.”
-
ICE has allied with local law enforcement and federal partners to support the surge in enforcement.
-
Civil rights organizations, including the National Immigrant Justice Center, are legally challenging the tactics, arguing they “skirt legal requirements” and threaten constitutional protections.
Final Thoughts
The use of collateral arrests marks a significant shift toward broad, indiscriminate enforcement rather than targeted action against individuals with serious crimes. As these measures unfold, continued legal battles and public scrutiny will define whether this becomes a normalized enforcement strategy or a contested overreach.